www.justiceblind.com
Winning and Losing in Iraq
Matthew Robinson, PhD
Although the ideas expressed in this column will surely not be popular, I
offer them in the hope that they will be seriously considered and generate a
healthy debate about the situation in Iraq, a situation created by US
leaders and supported by a large majority of American citizens.
To begin, here are thirteen facts about the Iraq war. First, the Iraq war was
planned by members of the Bush Administration long before it was initiated and even
before they declared publicly that war would be a last resort. Second, several
members of the Bush Administration called for the removal of Saddam Hussein—in
writing—years prior to being employed in the White House.
Third, Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks. Fourth, the
Saddam Hussein government had no operational ties to al Qaeda prior to or after
9/11. Fifth, Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda were sworn enemies for reasons related
to both religion and their views of government.
Sixth, the only group in Iraq with “ties to al Qaeda”—Ansar
al-Islam—operated in the Northern no-fly zone out of the control of Saddam
Hussein and within easy reach of US bombers without an invasion of the country.
This group called for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, as did Osama bin Laden.
Seventh, while it was widely believed that Saddam Hussein possessed very
dangerous weapons—or at the very least had an active weapons program—no
credible analysis suggested these weapons posed a threat to the United States.
Eighth, information from the Central Intelligence Agency suggested the
likelihood that Saddam Hussein would ever use biological or chemical weapons
against American interests was very low because he knew that doing so would
assure his destruction.
Ninth, in early 2001, both Condoleezza Rice and Collin Powell stated
publicly that Saddam Hussein was not a threat to the United States or even to his
neighbors because of the United Nations imposed sanctions that had been in
place for a decade after the first Gulf War.
Tenth, US leaders used the 9/11 attacks as justification to seek out and
compile knowingly false and questionable intelligence—often ignoring and
removing any pieces of data calling the accuracy of this information into
question—to make the case for war on Iraq.
Eleventh, the Iraq
war is illegal, being both a violation of international law and the US
Constitution. The war violates the United Nations Charter, which the US not only
signed but also largely wrote! This makes the war unconstitutional because
Article VI states: “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which
shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which
shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme
law of the land.”
Twelfth, the war on Iraq
was unnecessary and is now an unfettered disaster. Nearly 3,000 US military personnel have been killed in Iraq, and
approximately 655,000 Iraqis have died since the US-led invasion.
Thirteenth, Iraq
is now in an all out civil war. The scholarly definition of civil war says that
“warring groups must be from the same country and fighting for control of the
political center, control over a separatist state or to force a major change in
policy,” and “at least 1,000 people must have been killed, with at least 100
from each side.” Clearly, this is the case in Iraq.
Given these facts—each well documented—what are we to do? President Bush has
used terms like “stay the course” and insisted that US troops will remain in
Iraq until the “mission is complete” (this is more than three years after he
stood before a large banner atop an aircraft carrier declaring “Mission
Accomplished”). President Bush is wrong. Staying is a mistake. In fact, the war
has already been lost. Even top military leaders have testified to Congress
that there is no military solution to the war.
And so I am reminded, yet again, of Vietnam. In the documentary, The
Fog of War, former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara states that he and
President Johnson knew that war in Vietnam could not be won with
military action long before US forces were withdrawn from the country. At this
point in the war, approximately 25,000 US troops had been killed. By the
time we left the country, 58,000 US troops had died.
When asked why the US did
not end its commitment to Vietnam
when they knew they could not win, McNamara replied that President Johnson
thought that withdrawing US troops would send the wrong message to the enemy
and the rest of the world. Sound familiar?
In Vietnam, 33,000 US military
personnel died after we knew we could not win there. So, how many more
soldiers, marines, sailors, and airmen will die in Iraq for a war that is already
lost? Almost 2,500 Americans have been killed in Iraq since Saddam Hussein was
captured, more than 2,000 Americans have been killed since we transferred
authority to the democratically elected Iraqi government, and more than 1,000
Americans have died since Dick Cheney said the insurgency was in its “last
throes.”
President Bush has said that to leave would dishonor the dead. Does he mean
that more of our fathers, sons, brothers, mothers, daughters, and sisters must
die for nothing so that those fathers, sons, brothers, mothers, daughters, and
sisters who have died for nothing do not die for nothing? In my opinion, what
dishonored the dead was sending them to Iraq in the first place to die for
nothing. As a professional criminologist, I simply cannot think of a worse
crime.
President Bush has said that we will stay in Iraq
because leaving would produce a failed state in Iraq, a breeding ground for
terrorists. Yet, a memo prepared for Condoleezza Rice (reported by Bob Woodward
in his book, State of Denial) says that Iraq
is already a failed state, and we see every day that Iraq is already a breeding ground
for terrorists.
What created this situation was our invasion of the country, plain and
simple (e.g., there was no “al-Qaeda in Iraq” until after we invaded). And
as long as we are there, terrorists will flock to the country and we will
continue to inflame hatred all over the world against the United States.
What I am calling for is a radically different course of action. I offer the
following six ideas as a starting point. First, President Bush should apologize
to the American people, the US
military, and the rest of the world for creating a disaster in Iraq and
putting our country at greater risk of terrorism over the long term. He should
also acknowledge the deceit involved in the lead up to the war. The process of
reconciliation requires an acknowledgement of wrongdoing.
Second, Congress should impeach and convict President Bush and Vice
President Dick Cheney for “high crimes,” which include their abuse of power and
serious misconduct while in office. Stated simply, justice demands that this
occur.
Impeaching Bush and Cheney would send the signal to the world that we
American citizens are truly sorry for what we have done. It would also provide
evidence that Congress is ready once again to serve as a check and balance on
presidential power.
Third, before he leaves office, President Bush should immediately withdraw
all US troops from Iraq. He should
tell the Iraqi government that we will come back if they want us to, with the
support of the Iraqi people, but only if they make progress toward stabilizing
the country and ending their own civil war.
Fourth, the new president should use what leverage the United States has left to help build a truly
international peace-keeping force, led by Arab nations, to root out terrorists
in Iraq.
These troops can be deployed by the Iraqi government under the umbrella of NATO
rather than the Pentagon.
Fifth, the new president should enter the US into a global discussion to find
solutions to the problems that generate terrorism. He or she should commit the
US to a position of a neutral, fair broker for issues such as the
Israel-Palestine conflict, the proliferation of nuclear weapons and other
weapons of mass destruction, as well as other threats to human survival (such
as global warming).
Sixth, the new president should redirect US defense dollars and war spending
to rebuild countries devastated by our wars. Let’s tell the world we’re sorry
and then show them how sorry we are by putting our money where our mouths are.
Let’s give the governments in Iraq
and Afghanistan
the hundreds of billions of dollars we’re spending on military operations there
to rebuild the countries. The people there will embrace democracy and reject
terrorism when they begin to live decent lives.
The most important of these initiatives is to get our men and women serving
in the military in these countries home. The war is lost. The only question
left now is how many more Americans will die before we finally do something
about it.