www.justiceblind.com
Debating War
Matthew Robinson, PhD
Debating war makes little sense without referring to the
following empirical realities.
First, since 9/11 and America’s declared “war on terror,”
recruitment by and membership in al Qaeda is up.
Second, worldwide acts of terrorism are up.
Third, resentment, anger, and fear of the United States by people in nations
all over the world are up.
These claims can be verified easily. Try www.google.com.
Fourth, the war on Iraq is a diversion from the war on
terror.
This claim requires some explanation.
Investigations into 9/11 show that the nations most involved
were Saudi Arabia (Usama bin Laden and 15 of the 19 hijackers came from there;
some funds for the attacks came from Saudi royals); Afghanistan (the Taliban government
allowed al Qaeda to train there); and Pakistan (some hijackers trained there, additional
funds for the attacks came from Pakistani Inter Services Intelligence).
The US
responded by invading Afghanistan
and Iraq (a country that played
no role in 9/11) and by embracing both
Saudi Arabia and Pakistan (both played
significant roles in 9/11) as allies in the “war on terror.”
Even after the US
supposedly won in Afghanistan,
al Qaeda continues to train on Pakistani soil. Additionally, Vice President Dick
Cheney admits that the Taliban and al Qaeda are resurgent in Afghanistan and are readying for a “spring
offensive” against the people of Afghanistan and US forces.
The Iraq
war is thus a diversion from the war on terror, for it has inhibited our ability
to finish the job with al Qaeda in Afghanistan
and Pakistan.
Further, the war created a new terrorist group – al Qaeda in Iraq – which wreaks havoc daily on the people of
Iraq as well as US forces.
Thus, according to any empirical assessment but one, America’s war
on terror has been a massive failure.
The “but one” argument is this: “We have not been attacked
at home since 9/11!”
Yet, less than six years have passed. Eight years passed between
al-Qaeda’s first World
Trade Center
attack in 1993 and 9/11. Further, al-Qaeda asserts that each subsequent attack
must be more spectacular than the last. Stated simply, it takes time for
al-Qaeda to do what they do so well.
People who support US war can write all they want
about taking on every nation not friendly to us. Such a view simply ignores the
empirical realities of America’s
current wars. We’re losing everywhere we are fighting.